I was really enjoying his information and getting a lot out of it. But the end of the interview was disappointing to me, some things were not clarified. You asked him to explain the …… Belt, and he didn’t. It was not clear what “two” realities were possible, because he had just named three! So I was very unclear as to how he sees the future. He made a passing comment that the New Age was created to confuse people, but what exactly? Does that include his interview, which some would consider new age??? He never mentioned anything about his take on the Mayan Calendar timing or the Kali Yuga, as far as our current state of spiritual evolution. Basically the future was left out of the interview!
Thank goodness I was vacationing when this line up of interviews came up.
As a long time CMN friend and long time Project Camelot fan, this sort of news is not new at all. Regina was quite clear at the beginning of the interview that this was like none other..
I was happy to watch the new line up. The first I chose was about Montauk because I’d heard this from P.C.
No(thing) surprised me because I’d heard it before but this was just confirming what I’d heard, however… in this reality of mine, I choose to detach myself from those horrible thoughts and people and energies etc…
Balance what you listen to… go outdoors and stare into nature. :)
Thank you! Had a past life regression session today where I saw myself as a reptilian female residing in India. Funny how I decided to watch this interview after the session today and hear from Stewart that Hindus have copied the cast system from reptilian races. He also mentioned that the mixing of two races took place and that is remotely what I experienced during the session as well. I remember feeling sad that I couldn’t reveal my true self to my fiancee who was a human male, an Indian prince or some sort of royalty, and who didn’t have a clue I wasn’t human. Well…the puzzle isn’t completely solved but I’m getting closer thanks to this interview too :)
Mr. Swerdlow has so much in common with Andrew Basiago (Project Pegasus) and Alex Collier (andromedan contactee). A great deal of what he says is repeated by these other people who have been exposed to and educated on the Alpha Dracos and the illuminati. I think what confuses people here is lack of knowledge. Quantum physics explains that the probability and the outcome of any situation can change through the number of observers, prayer and even forms of intercession. If you establish any critical mass either positive or negative the outcome of a probablity can seem finite in a linear physical so- called reality. I loved this interview and I so enjoy Mr. Swerdlows interviews. As someone who was diagnosed with synesthesia, he has helped me to understand what I see, how to interpret my experiences and the possible reasons for why. Medical science gives a physical explanation for my “condition” but Mr. Swerdlow has taught me both why I have it and how to use it to my advantage and for the benefit of others. I am very thankful for both he and CMN.
This is one of the best interviews we’ve ever seen with Mr Stewart Swerdlow. We have learned a lot from his work, and We are glad to see him as a gest in such a good program. Intelligent and respectful interviews like this only help people to approach these subjects that, due to mainstream education and other types of manipulation, are sometimes difficult to accept. Congratulations! With our best wishes, André & Josira
In terms of content, this was certainly an interesting interview with lots of pieces to chew on…hm…I want to use a metaphor about ‘digestion’. Either these pieces can be digested or not. For myself, I’m not certain what it’s going to be. Perhaps the most resonant thing I personally got from this discussion was that we all ultimately must decide what we will accept into ourselves (digest) as ‘truth’ – this being a function of our own connection to what people are calling ‘the source’ – a connection mediated by what people are calling ‘the heart’.
The questions I have have an epistemological and hermeneutical ‘feel’ to them, and they arise to some degree with all of these interviews – but most particularly as an interview explores information further and further away both from accepted norms and from common lived experiences. Simply put, how does this person know what he knows?
We know that he’s psychic (we’re told that, but we can’t really experience it, so it is the first thing that we must digest whole) We also know that he was in the Montauk Project (another thing we are asked to digest) – though one doesn’t experience a whole ‘project’, but simply some facet or facets of it. But if we can accept that, other questions arise: how have his experiences come to be ‘knowledge’? What experiences does he have/has he had that conveys the raw ‘data’? What constitutes the data? And how does he come to understand what that data actually means? If a caveman looked through a microscope, would s/he automatically ‘know’ what a bacteria was? Heck, if I started to see auras would I automatically know how to diagnoses someone or treat them?
From what I could glean from this interview, Stewart’s experiences with Montauk, for example, are close to thirty years old. How did he experience Montauk back then, with the mind of a traumatized child/teenager? What particular experiences did he have? How did he interpret these experiences? What was excluded from his experience, etc. As a purported subject to experimentation, he probably wasn’t included in boardroom meetings, nor did he have the ear of those in charge. He would have been more of a lab animal, I’m guessing – not someone with an overhead view, necessarily. Not trying to be disrespectful – just trying to get a picture of what it might have been like for him.
I’m also not trying to debunk or create dissent in this forum… These sorts of interviews are exciting and mysterious and bring out a strong and vital sense of curiosity! And I actually hate the polemics that the format of forums sometimes brings out in people. I’m just trying to wrap my head around this or find a vantage from which to understand how to hear these sorts of interviews. I need to know how a person comes to know what they know so that I can truly ‘hear’ what is being said. That was an awful sentence, but I really mean it! Taken-for-granted-truths are dangerous.
Even in the most basic, straight forward and honest science, there is always interpretation – interpretation that has to some degree a subjective element to it. We, even when we behave scientistically, bring something of our selves to that which we are observing – our history, our experiences, our education, our cultural lenses, our beliefs, our feelings, etc. Although science has developed itself to minimize the impacts of subjectivity, it still exists. And because of this, in some cases, interpretations can be wrong. The current point of view is never better than a better point of view. But, unless you are god your perspective will at the very best remain incomplete.
So, it is one thing to be talking about ‘electricity’ or ‘clouds’ or ‘chemicals’ or other things that scientists like to study, but what happens when we are talking about reptilians and mind control and illuminati and hyperspace. Can these things be ‘experienced’ – and in such a comprehensive way that totalizing statements can be made about them – that concrete, lineal truths can be extrapolated?
Regina, this was the best interview I have ever watched with Stewart. It is easy to be dubious about him because his history is far from all peaches and cream. But it is a time to watch out for how easily we are conned and seduced by what is going on, and Stewart does remind us of this.
I doubt any ‘guru’ that teaches how to expand your wealth, instead of your altruism, or just even mentions material benefits.The interview was quite credible until the very last seconds.Pity.
Stewart Swerdlow seems so caught up in the game that was played on him that there becomes a point of credibility. I have no doubt he believes what he is speaking, but seems to be disconnected from spirit or source. Many people who are in the world of manipulation always gain your trust through stories of personal grief as form of empathy to gain your trust. I have never believed that Aliens who intervene with humanity have an evil agenda. It may happen, but to say all Aliens seems like an agenda to make sure people distrust any contact with anyone other than other humans. See this month’s James Gilliland interview, you’ll get another quite different opinion of Aliens and other beings.
What bothered me most, is he speaks from a point of view as if he is an authority on everything, but when he said that 10-15% of the population is being controlled by electronics, he lost me. If we are all made from the same stuff, if that was actually possible, we all could be controlled. At some point he gives off the persona that in all this secret government technology that resistance is futile. He messes, religion, Hollywood, Secret Societies, Secret Projects, secret agendas all in one seamlessly stream of bull. Spoken like a real politician, who speaks just enough truth to keep your attention, but never specifics. I hope you take what he says with a grain of salt as motivational speakers are salesmen, but salesmen for who?
SpIrituality is often deemed as the opposite of materialism, but that is not true.! As we are Creators, we have infinite possibilities and are entitled to share all the abundance the Universe offers, which can manifest in many different ways…It is not wrong to want to create wealth for yourself or others, often great material wealth promotes great altruism anyway…
Loved this interview with Stewart. I think he is an incredibly strong person after being subjected to the abuse and experimentation from these people.
I found it fascinating how easy it is for the manipulators to programme humanity and we wouldn’t even know about it. (Scary thought)
The on going genetic experimentation through out the world of cross species and food altering is probably their end plan for our species.
A sad thought, though we are our own creators of destiny if we can break free from all the
brainwashing,pollution,war,etc.. I can’t remember if the word love came up in the interview?? Maybe my own years of subliminal programming denied access to that one. They after all don’t like us with emotions because they are harder to control. I wonder if we didn’t have the reptillian gene, then the true human traits wouldn’t have fear encoded in them, for survival.
I have to say that I was conflicted about listening to this. I try to reconcile:
What you focus on will be your truth, your reality.
vs
I need to be educated as to the truth of what has happened.
If there is not ONE truth, how can he purport to know what will be happening in the future? Or rather, why would he want to project something so negative if he has a choice? And why am I listening to this version of reality if I don’t want it to be mine?
A nother brilliant interview. Stewart a man who like to work outside the box and share his finding his ideas with us all. We talk about Questioning every thing I think Stewart has achieved this congratulations.
I saw the interview and I found it to be very interesting. Some of the information provided by him was quite shocking and a little difficult for me to accept. Like the fact that jesus is an alien creation bought about to further their own agenda. I became sad. And was like whhaaattttt. My goodness. Is anything true anymore? I can see how the comment told to me by my boss that “some people just loose grips with reality” can be true. So I was like alright Joangel think about it. The story of jesus onto intself is a little weird. A virgin women gives birth to a man that radically change the world view at that time. So then I was like, alright screw it who cares if jesus is an artifical creation. It all about the message and if how he lived his life resonates with me. In essence we are all “artifical” creation. Kinda. IDK. I Gotta look that word up now. I wonder who was this alien group was and if knowing who they are has any value. Are we better off from jesus message now? and what can we learn er I learn? Hard to tell when there so much manipulation by other people. I can’t judge for my self. Fustrating.
Another thing that shocked me is when he said that they are creating a situation where the world will look very androgenous. I WAS LIKE Oh MY GOD. yo this is nuts. thoughts of homosexaulity, bisexuality, and hetrosexuality came into my head. I guess ultimatley people shouldnt mess with humans genetically. thats my personal belief. Why? cuz I believe in personal choice. and for that created being who was like that he deserve to choose who he wants to be. so as I type i am like maybe thats the whole perchoice incarnation thing come into play or something. IDK it all gets very confusing.
At the end day when I see things like new york passing a bill that doesn’t discrimminate against people of sexual orientation so that they can live a prosperous and joyous life makes me happy. I guess we have to seriously look within ourselves and say “who do I choose to be now in this given situation” and is it “true for me”. and go from there together. all together good interview, you definitly blew my mind. uhm yea more interesting things about the future and different reality that I didnt get into that I have to digest. as yoda says meditate on it I shall.
According the Acharya, who has done extensive research on the subject of jesus, there was no historical jesus. The biblical jesus was a clone of an egyptian god. You can watch her interview here:
not wrong. the moon is unique as far as is known in that it doesn’t rotate. We always see the same side of the moon. Have you not heard the expression, “the dark side of the moon” ie there is a side that is unseen.
The moon *has* to rotate for it to *seem* like it’s not rotating. It’s not that difficult to figure out by yourself. What’s amazing is how he keeps claiming this, even while he’s been offered the mechanics of it. It’s just one of the endless obvious giveaways about him. You could go on and on. His trick is to seemingly “know it all” which lures in most people who are looking for someone to tell them all the answers. Then he keeps them attached by never giving more than one line of information (max 2 :-) and often grasping for his favorite excuses to “clarify” anything with.
I do appreciate his take on what’s happening in the world, because it can offer an interesting viewpoint.
Saving...
The Yuga Cycles of the Ages,Nevada City, May 25-28
PDF 
I was really enjoying his information and getting a lot out of it. But the end of the interview was disappointing to me, some things were not clarified. You asked him to explain the …… Belt, and he didn’t. It was not clear what “two” realities were possible, because he had just named three! So I was very unclear as to how he sees the future. He made a passing comment that the New Age was created to confuse people, but what exactly? Does that include his interview, which some would consider new age??? He never mentioned anything about his take on the Mayan Calendar timing or the Kali Yuga, as far as our current state of spiritual evolution. Basically the future was left out of the interview!
‘holy smokes’…….hahaha
Thank goodness I was vacationing when this line up of interviews came up.
As a long time CMN friend and long time Project Camelot fan, this sort of news is not new at all. Regina was quite clear at the beginning of the interview that this was like none other..
I was happy to watch the new line up. The first I chose was about Montauk because I’d heard this from P.C.
No(thing) surprised me because I’d heard it before but this was just confirming what I’d heard, however… in this reality of mine, I choose to detach myself from those horrible thoughts and people and energies etc…
Balance what you listen to… go outdoors and stare into nature. :)
Thank you! Had a past life regression session today where I saw myself as a reptilian female residing in India. Funny how I decided to watch this interview after the session today and hear from Stewart that Hindus have copied the cast system from reptilian races. He also mentioned that the mixing of two races took place and that is remotely what I experienced during the session as well. I remember feeling sad that I couldn’t reveal my true self to my fiancee who was a human male, an Indian prince or some sort of royalty, and who didn’t have a clue I wasn’t human. Well…the puzzle isn’t completely solved but I’m getting closer thanks to this interview too :)
Mr. Swerdlow has so much in common with Andrew Basiago (Project Pegasus) and Alex Collier (andromedan contactee). A great deal of what he says is repeated by these other people who have been exposed to and educated on the Alpha Dracos and the illuminati. I think what confuses people here is lack of knowledge. Quantum physics explains that the probability and the outcome of any situation can change through the number of observers, prayer and even forms of intercession. If you establish any critical mass either positive or negative the outcome of a probablity can seem finite in a linear physical so- called reality. I loved this interview and I so enjoy Mr. Swerdlows interviews. As someone who was diagnosed with synesthesia, he has helped me to understand what I see, how to interpret my experiences and the possible reasons for why. Medical science gives a physical explanation for my “condition” but Mr. Swerdlow has taught me both why I have it and how to use it to my advantage and for the benefit of others. I am very thankful for both he and CMN.
This is one of the best interviews we’ve ever seen with Mr Stewart Swerdlow. We have learned a lot from his work, and We are glad to see him as a gest in such a good program. Intelligent and respectful interviews like this only help people to approach these subjects that, due to mainstream education and other types of manipulation, are sometimes difficult to accept. Congratulations! With our best wishes, André & Josira
In terms of content, this was certainly an interesting interview with lots of pieces to chew on…hm…I want to use a metaphor about ‘digestion’. Either these pieces can be digested or not. For myself, I’m not certain what it’s going to be. Perhaps the most resonant thing I personally got from this discussion was that we all ultimately must decide what we will accept into ourselves (digest) as ‘truth’ – this being a function of our own connection to what people are calling ‘the source’ – a connection mediated by what people are calling ‘the heart’.
The questions I have have an epistemological and hermeneutical ‘feel’ to them, and they arise to some degree with all of these interviews – but most particularly as an interview explores information further and further away both from accepted norms and from common lived experiences. Simply put, how does this person know what he knows?
We know that he’s psychic (we’re told that, but we can’t really experience it, so it is the first thing that we must digest whole) We also know that he was in the Montauk Project (another thing we are asked to digest) – though one doesn’t experience a whole ‘project’, but simply some facet or facets of it. But if we can accept that, other questions arise: how have his experiences come to be ‘knowledge’? What experiences does he have/has he had that conveys the raw ‘data’? What constitutes the data? And how does he come to understand what that data actually means? If a caveman looked through a microscope, would s/he automatically ‘know’ what a bacteria was? Heck, if I started to see auras would I automatically know how to diagnoses someone or treat them?
From what I could glean from this interview, Stewart’s experiences with Montauk, for example, are close to thirty years old. How did he experience Montauk back then, with the mind of a traumatized child/teenager? What particular experiences did he have? How did he interpret these experiences? What was excluded from his experience, etc. As a purported subject to experimentation, he probably wasn’t included in boardroom meetings, nor did he have the ear of those in charge. He would have been more of a lab animal, I’m guessing – not someone with an overhead view, necessarily. Not trying to be disrespectful – just trying to get a picture of what it might have been like for him.
I’m also not trying to debunk or create dissent in this forum… These sorts of interviews are exciting and mysterious and bring out a strong and vital sense of curiosity! And I actually hate the polemics that the format of forums sometimes brings out in people. I’m just trying to wrap my head around this or find a vantage from which to understand how to hear these sorts of interviews. I need to know how a person comes to know what they know so that I can truly ‘hear’ what is being said. That was an awful sentence, but I really mean it! Taken-for-granted-truths are dangerous.
Even in the most basic, straight forward and honest science, there is always interpretation – interpretation that has to some degree a subjective element to it. We, even when we behave scientistically, bring something of our selves to that which we are observing – our history, our experiences, our education, our cultural lenses, our beliefs, our feelings, etc. Although science has developed itself to minimize the impacts of subjectivity, it still exists. And because of this, in some cases, interpretations can be wrong. The current point of view is never better than a better point of view. But, unless you are god your perspective will at the very best remain incomplete.
So, it is one thing to be talking about ‘electricity’ or ‘clouds’ or ‘chemicals’ or other things that scientists like to study, but what happens when we are talking about reptilians and mind control and illuminati and hyperspace. Can these things be ‘experienced’ – and in such a comprehensive way that totalizing statements can be made about them – that concrete, lineal truths can be extrapolated?
this is terrifying! while he was decribing the chair with wings nmknocked the mic i jumped! ahh!
I will try and edit that so it is not so much of a shock!
Regina, this was the best interview I have ever watched with Stewart. It is easy to be dubious about him because his history is far from all peaches and cream. But it is a time to watch out for how easily we are conned and seduced by what is going on, and Stewart does remind us of this.
I doubt any ‘guru’ that teaches how to expand your wealth, instead of your altruism, or just even mentions material benefits.The interview was quite credible until the very last seconds.Pity.
Stewart Swerdlow seems so caught up in the game that was played on him that there becomes a point of credibility. I have no doubt he believes what he is speaking, but seems to be disconnected from spirit or source. Many people who are in the world of manipulation always gain your trust through stories of personal grief as form of empathy to gain your trust. I have never believed that Aliens who intervene with humanity have an evil agenda. It may happen, but to say all Aliens seems like an agenda to make sure people distrust any contact with anyone other than other humans. See this month’s James Gilliland interview, you’ll get another quite different opinion of Aliens and other beings.
What bothered me most, is he speaks from a point of view as if he is an authority on everything, but when he said that 10-15% of the population is being controlled by electronics, he lost me. If we are all made from the same stuff, if that was actually possible, we all could be controlled. At some point he gives off the persona that in all this secret government technology that resistance is futile. He messes, religion, Hollywood, Secret Societies, Secret Projects, secret agendas all in one seamlessly stream of bull. Spoken like a real politician, who speaks just enough truth to keep your attention, but never specifics. I hope you take what he says with a grain of salt as motivational speakers are salesmen, but salesmen for who?
SpIrituality is often deemed as the opposite of materialism, but that is not true.! As we are Creators, we have infinite possibilities and are entitled to share all the abundance the Universe offers, which can manifest in many different ways…It is not wrong to want to create wealth for yourself or others, often great material wealth promotes great altruism anyway…
Loved this interview with Stewart. I think he is an incredibly strong person after being subjected to the abuse and experimentation from these people.
I found it fascinating how easy it is for the manipulators to programme humanity and we wouldn’t even know about it. (Scary thought)
The on going genetic experimentation through out the world of cross species and food altering is probably their end plan for our species.
A sad thought, though we are our own creators of destiny if we can break free from all the
brainwashing,pollution,war,etc.. I can’t remember if the word love came up in the interview?? Maybe my own years of subliminal programming denied access to that one. They after all don’t like us with emotions because they are harder to control. I wonder if we didn’t have the reptillian gene, then the true human traits wouldn’t have fear encoded in them, for survival.
Thank You…
Love and Freedom for us humans… :-)
I have to say that I was conflicted about listening to this. I try to reconcile:
What you focus on will be your truth, your reality.
vs
I need to be educated as to the truth of what has happened.
If there is not ONE truth, how can he purport to know what will be happening in the future? Or rather, why would he want to project something so negative if he has a choice? And why am I listening to this version of reality if I don’t want it to be mine?
Ahhhhhhhh… :o
A nother brilliant interview. Stewart a man who like to work outside the box and share his finding his ideas with us all. We talk about Questioning every thing I think Stewart has achieved this congratulations.
I found this interview very interesting. I had to watch it a couple times. There is a lot of good discussion which validates a lot of my own thoughts.
wow, now i am very curious about this interview, will post a comment later
I saw the interview and I found it to be very interesting. Some of the information provided by him was quite shocking and a little difficult for me to accept. Like the fact that jesus is an alien creation bought about to further their own agenda. I became sad. And was like whhaaattttt. My goodness. Is anything true anymore? I can see how the comment told to me by my boss that “some people just loose grips with reality” can be true. So I was like alright Joangel think about it. The story of jesus onto intself is a little weird. A virgin women gives birth to a man that radically change the world view at that time. So then I was like, alright screw it who cares if jesus is an artifical creation. It all about the message and if how he lived his life resonates with me. In essence we are all “artifical” creation. Kinda. IDK. I Gotta look that word up now. I wonder who was this alien group was and if knowing who they are has any value. Are we better off from jesus message now? and what can we learn er I learn? Hard to tell when there so much manipulation by other people. I can’t judge for my self. Fustrating.
Another thing that shocked me is when he said that they are creating a situation where the world will look very androgenous. I WAS LIKE Oh MY GOD. yo this is nuts. thoughts of homosexaulity, bisexuality, and hetrosexuality came into my head. I guess ultimatley people shouldnt mess with humans genetically. thats my personal belief. Why? cuz I believe in personal choice. and for that created being who was like that he deserve to choose who he wants to be. so as I type i am like maybe thats the whole perchoice incarnation thing come into play or something. IDK it all gets very confusing.
At the end day when I see things like new york passing a bill that doesn’t discrimminate against people of sexual orientation so that they can live a prosperous and joyous life makes me happy. I guess we have to seriously look within ourselves and say “who do I choose to be now in this given situation” and is it “true for me”. and go from there together. all together good interview, you definitly blew my mind. uhm yea more interesting things about the future and different reality that I didnt get into that I have to digest. as yoda says meditate on it I shall.
sincerely,
Joangel
According the Acharya, who has done extensive research on the subject of jesus, there was no historical jesus. The biblical jesus was a clone of an egyptian god. You can watch her interview here:
http://www.cmn.tv/interviews/acharya-s/
[...] Watch the full interview here [...]
The moon does rotate about its axis.
No, the moon does not rotate on its axis. If the moon rotated we would see the other side of it, we never do, we always see the same side of the moon.
Wrong
http://www.jimloy.com/astro/moon0.htm
not wrong. the moon is unique as far as is known in that it doesn’t rotate. We always see the same side of the moon. Have you not heard the expression, “the dark side of the moon” ie there is a side that is unseen.
no it does not. The moon is stationary. If it rotated we would be exposed to the dark side which we are not.
The moon *has* to rotate for it to *seem* like it’s not rotating. It’s not that difficult to figure out by yourself. What’s amazing is how he keeps claiming this, even while he’s been offered the mechanics of it. It’s just one of the endless obvious giveaways about him. You could go on and on. His trick is to seemingly “know it all” which lures in most people who are looking for someone to tell them all the answers. Then he keeps them attached by never giving more than one line of information (max 2 :-) and often grasping for his favorite excuses to “clarify” anything with.
I do appreciate his take on what’s happening in the world, because it can offer an interesting viewpoint.