I think this fellow takes forever to make a point, repeating the same things over and over (the “filter” bit) at a snail’s pace.
I waited patiently for any real substance behind his claims for immense human antiquity and only got one anecdotal story about one woman archaeologist, Mary (?) Leakey, whom he says claimed to find incredibly ancient human footprints. He makes no statements to back this up; not where the claim can be corroborated, not where hard information on the actual strata can be found, or much of anything else.
It all seems like a long, self-aggrandizing lecture in which he is right and Science is wrong. Science is often wrong, but if you’re going to refute any of it, why not get to the brass tacks and quite wasting everyone’s time? Or is the main idea that we should go buy the book–which he mentions continuously?
I’m certainly open to new ideas, but this argument seems tedious and without any core facts.
Michael Cremo reminds me of one of those rare diamonds glistening with ancient knowlegde, buried and hidden from humanity.
The truth of his vibrant colours flow unhindered through the vacuum of life, never faultering to the bureaucratic lies spun and dosed with Darwinian time.
Thy conscious reflection frozen in matter conscious transended beauty.
Thank you Michael & Regina. This topic and the spiritual evolution of consciousness has been a deep study for me since 1971. I’ve read hundreds of books and practiced for 40 years, and one book I’ve re-read several times is:
The Ocean of Love, The Anurag Sagar of Kabir. In studying the vast offerings from mysticism, I found this essential to synthesize with studies of world religions.
Always love Michael Cremo who is likely closer to the truth that those who rehash old traditions or ideas. I only say this because if you think of what he does and the questions he must ask about all that is hidden from humanity, life and the process… if the universe responds to him, he has to be closer to the actual truth than most because he has more physical evidence to play with than any other on the planet.
Excellent interview. I have respected Micheal’s work for some time now. His longer interviews on Red Ice Creations are worth the time for anyone wanting a bigger dose and more exposure to his ideas.
The Red Queen Paradox developed by biologist Leigh Van Valen (based on Carroll’s ‘Alice in wonderland’) clearly demonstrates that Darwin’s theory is flawed.
What credibility and such clarity…I want to express how resonant this message is…While listening, I found myself wondering how to have this message produced for Discovery, History or other widely watched TV to mass viewers to contemplate and perpetuate this great wisdom and conscious shift…I’m thankful to have heard this…
Thank you for this great interview. I have never for a moment believed the human race was evolved from apes. I have had many lively discussions with people throughout the years about this. I have always believed humans were ‘star born’. I am glad I am a person who thinks out of the box.
Saving...
PDF 
I think this fellow takes forever to make a point, repeating the same things over and over (the “filter” bit) at a snail’s pace.
I waited patiently for any real substance behind his claims for immense human antiquity and only got one anecdotal story about one woman archaeologist, Mary (?) Leakey, whom he says claimed to find incredibly ancient human footprints. He makes no statements to back this up; not where the claim can be corroborated, not where hard information on the actual strata can be found, or much of anything else.
It all seems like a long, self-aggrandizing lecture in which he is right and Science is wrong. Science is often wrong, but if you’re going to refute any of it, why not get to the brass tacks and quite wasting everyone’s time? Or is the main idea that we should go buy the book–which he mentions continuously?
I’m certainly open to new ideas, but this argument seems tedious and without any core facts.
A million Thanks to Regina and Michael for this awakening interview.
You go guy! :)
Be very well & God bless, Michael.
Roger (‘Raj’)
Let the Word go forth! God bless, Michael.
Roger (R Raj eL)
Michael Cremo reminds me of one of those rare diamonds glistening with ancient knowlegde, buried and hidden from humanity.
The truth of his vibrant colours flow unhindered through the vacuum of life, never faultering to the bureaucratic lies spun and dosed with Darwinian time.
Thy conscious reflection frozen in matter conscious transended beauty.
[...] Watch the full interview here [...]
Thank you Michael & Regina. This topic and the spiritual evolution of consciousness has been a deep study for me since 1971. I’ve read hundreds of books and practiced for 40 years, and one book I’ve re-read several times is:
The Ocean of Love, The Anurag Sagar of Kabir. In studying the vast offerings from mysticism, I found this essential to synthesize with studies of world religions.
Blessings to you.
Thank you so much for this WONDERFUL Interview!! So much great wisdom, and I agree with most every comment above! :)
Always love Michael Cremo who is likely closer to the truth that those who rehash old traditions or ideas. I only say this because if you think of what he does and the questions he must ask about all that is hidden from humanity, life and the process… if the universe responds to him, he has to be closer to the actual truth than most because he has more physical evidence to play with than any other on the planet.
Excellent interview. I have respected Micheal’s work for some time now. His longer interviews on Red Ice Creations are worth the time for anyone wanting a bigger dose and more exposure to his ideas.
Read here about the Red Queen Paradox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_Hypothesis
The Red Queen Paradox developed by biologist Leigh Van Valen (based on Carroll’s ‘Alice in wonderland’) clearly demonstrates that Darwin’s theory is flawed.
“There is enough for everyone’s needs, but not enough for everyone’s greed.” Gandhi I loved this interview. Thank you so much.
Delightful!
Loved his summary at the end: “We have come down from pure consciousness & are meant to go back”.
What credibility and such clarity…I want to express how resonant this message is…While listening, I found myself wondering how to have this message produced for Discovery, History or other widely watched TV to mass viewers to contemplate and perpetuate this great wisdom and conscious shift…I’m thankful to have heard this…
WOW!!! The infinite possibilities and all with choice..? WOW Thanks
Thank you for this great interview. I have never for a moment believed the human race was evolved from apes. I have had many lively discussions with people throughout the years about this. I have always believed humans were ‘star born’. I am glad I am a person who thinks out of the box.
There are not enough people like Michael Cremo in the world or perhaps even in the Universe! :-)
Michael Cremo is to free thinkers what Richard Dawkins is to closed minded atheists.
Wonderful interview.
I think Darwin’s Theory Of Evolution should be reclassified as FICTION.
Thank you!